Thursday, February 29, 2024

A Review of the Book "What's the T?" by Juno Dawson


Title: What's the T?
Author: Juno Dawson
Publisher: Sourcebooks Fire
Year: 2022
325 pages

From the Back: Discover what it means to be a young transgender and/or nonbinary person in the twenty-first century in this frank and funny guide. Filled with stories from real teens about their own experiences, straightforward educational information, and hilarious illustrations, this book offers a fun, enlightening introduction to the full spectrum of gender identity. The perfect blend of informative and supportive, this is the ultimate handbook for those questioning their identity or just looking to learn more from trans and nonbinary voices.

Personal Thoughts: If there was anything you wanted to know about being transgender, this is an excellent resource. Juno Dawson is a British author and a transgender woman. She wrote "What's the T?" geared towards teenagers who are possibly questioning their gender and gender identity. However, everyone would benefit from reading this book, whether you are questioning, already transitioning, or an ally. There is even an entire section for parents and caregivers. With an incredible sense of humour, Dawson brings to the forefront some of the difficult topics that people who are questioning their gender or gender identity might be dealing with like what it means to be transgender, the difficulties of coming out (possibly for the 2nd time), and how to deal with the dreaded bathroom issue. Dawson talks a little bit about the law but is open about the fact that she lives in England and can only speak to British laws.
    Because it is written for teens, reading this book was very easy. However, it still contained very good information and I would highly recommend it for anyone looking for more information about the T in 2SLGBTQ+. I especially enjoyed the brief blurbs on historically transgender people. It shows that being transgender isn't a new thing, despite what some very vocal people are trying to tell the world.

Friday, February 23, 2024

The Joy of Expectation: A Sermon for the Second Sunday of Lent

Photo by Nina Mercado on Unsplash

Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable to you, O Lord. Amen.


My mom has always been that mom who buys Christmas presents all year and then, as soon as December hits, she gets them all wrapped and put under the tree. When we were younger, my brother and I would be tortured by seeing a big pile of gifts of all different shapes, colours, and sizes just sitting there, waiting to be opened. Every day after school, we’d sit there, playing with the boxes wrapped in pretty paper, rearranging the pile – by size, by name, by colour…

 

The anticipation of Christmas morning was almost painful. There was so much joy and expectation amassed in those gifts. One year, I decided to add to the fun and try to guess what each of my presents were. Turns out, I guessed correctly almost every time which, as it turns out, took away all of the fun of opening the gift. It seems that the joy found in the unexpected was higher than the joy of the expected.

 

Life is full of expectant moments: expecting a visitor that you haven’t seen in a long time, a baby that you’ve waited months to meet, an award you were nominated for, a new job you applied for. The joy of these moments is found in the nervousness of waiting, of expecting something new, big, exciting…

 

Expectant joy is the joy that we know is coming, but it is not here yet in its fullness. Expectant joy trembles with shimmering possibility that has not yet come into being but will, and that sheer potential is enough to lighten loads, strengthen hearts, unbind minds, and stir hopes. Practicing

expectant joy might look absurd: it’s an act that resists rationalization and believes in six impossible things before breakfast, à la Alice in Wonderland. Expectant joy invites our faith, and it demands our trust.

 

This expectant joy echoes through God’s words to Abram, even before Abram’s son Isaac is born: “I have made you the ancestor of a multitude of nations”. God shows up and repeats the covenantal promise to Abraham that his descendants would be exceedingly numerous. And Abraham, now 99 years old, with a 90-year-old wife, “fell on his face and laughed.” Abraham simply did not believe that God could or would keep the promise. The thing about expectations is that God always seems to exceed them, to do the completely unexpected. God kept the covenant with Abraham and Sarah, who gave birth to Isaac. Abraham then trusted God’s promises and there was an expected continuation of deliverance from God on the other promises that were made.

 

This expectant joy is also revealed in the gospel text. Jesus stands in the center of the scene, the Messiah who has come to fulfill God’s ancient promises. Peter knows this. He just said it himself in the verses leading up to today’s reading. But here is the Son of God with a repellent forecast, quite openly telling his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and undergo great suffering and rejection, be killed, and rise again after three days, breaking the power of sin and death. That, Jesus knows, is the good news that he has come to bring, embody, and accomplish. The expectant joy at the very center of Christian faith comes from his resurrection from the dead. This is the jubilant realization of God’s salvific intent, but it cannot arrive until after Jesus suffers crucifixion.

 

Peter can’t buy Jesus’ absurd proposal. Why does Jesus need to suffer and endure anything to introduce pure joy? Isn’t his presence on earth already joyful enough? The man can heal the sick and cast out demons! He preaches, and crowds gather to listen! He teaches, and the experts can’t refute him! He is baptized, and the heavens are torn apart! What is this nonsense about suffering and rejection? Where is the joy in that? Jesus interrupts Peter’s well-intended lecture. “Get behind me, Satan,” he says. “You are setting your mind not on divine things, but on human things” (Mark 8:33).

 

It’s only from behind Jesus that Peter, or any of us, can learn to follow him. If Jesus gave us a choice, we’d never pick the path that leads to the cross. That, Jesus tells us, is exactly what he’s

asking us to do. He promises that there is joy on the other side: beyond the cross, he will be raised. Beyond the cross, we will find our lives. Beyond the cross, we will learn that joy does not need a reason to exist that the world deems “sufficient.” We will find it in the darkness before the dawn, in the emptiness of a tomb, in the weeping confusion of the Easter proclamation that the women make.

 

Christians live in between the right now and the not yet. So how do we find joy in the time of expectation, in the period of coming, but not here yet? The present moment is often fraught with grief: neither the world nor we ourselves are as God desires. Creation is rife with violence and division, suffering and hate, and we don’t know if we will see it change in our lifetimes. But God will fulfill all that God has promised. That joy is with us even in the midst of the not yet, and it has the power to shape our encounter with the right now. Through this complexity, God invites and equips us to cultivate expectant joy, a persistent trust in God’s future promises that empowers us to work toward God’s vision immediately.

 

Lent is a time of waiting and of expectation. Peter and the rest of the apostles might not understand, but Jesus knows that he is walking towards something new, big, exciting… Jesus knows that there will be joy on the other side of the cross. It thrums through his promise to the displaced disciples that he will prepare a place for them. It inhabits each crumb of communion bread, a foretaste of the feast to come. It resounds through baptism and funeral liturgies when we recall Paul’s words: “if we have been united with him in a death like his, we will certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his”.

 

There is joy in the waiting, in the expectation. We know something important is about to happen. When we hear the promise of the resurrection, we can feel joy in that expectation. And while laughing might seem like the wrong thing to do during a time like Lent, as we wait for Easter, as we hold our expectation of promises fulfilled, sometimes, in all of that expectant joy, all you can do is laugh.

 

God of joy, turn our laughter into the joy of expectation and the realization of faith. Teach us to laugh with Sarah and Abraham, with Peter and the apostles, and with all whom you bless.

 

Amen.




Resources:
workingpreacher.org
Barn Geese Worship

Saturday, February 17, 2024

The Joy of Rainbows: A Sermon for the First Sunday of Lent


Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable to you, O Lord. Amen.

 

Have you ever noticed that when you’ve heard or read a story so many times that it becomes so familiar that you don’t even have to read all the words to play out the story in your head? Take, for example, the story of Noah’s Ark. Now, for most of us, we have heard this story since we were kids. I bet just hearing the words “Noah’s Ark” you can practically picture the entire story but I’m going retell it here anyway.

 

God called down to Noah and told him to build a big boat because God was going to send a huge flood to wipe everything off the face of the earth – people, animals, plants, everything. God wasn’t happy with the way people were living so God wanted to erase it all and start over. God gave Noah lots of instructions about this boat and who all was allowed on it – Noah and his family as well as two of every animal.

 

So, everyone got onto the boat and suddenly it began to rain. It rained for 40 days, and 40 nights and the entire earth became covered in water. Eventually the rain stopped, and the boat came aground on a mountain. God told Noah and his family and all the animals that they were to fill the earth once again. God also promised that never again would an attempt be made to destroy the earth.

 

What is one of the first things that comes to mind when you think back on the story of Noah’s Ark? A Rainbow! Noah and his wife, in front of the ark, surrounded by all sorts of animals, and a giant rainbow across the sky. Something like that, right?

 

Ah but listen to this. Here is Genesis verse 13: “I have set my bow in the clouds, and it shall be a sign of the covenant between me and the earth.”

 

The bow mentioned here is a weapon, as in bow and arrow. By setting the “bow in the clouds”, God is hanging up his weapon, God is disarming himself. The hanging bow is a reminder to God that God will not lift up such violence again. It is a reminder that God’s way of “doing business” will forever be different. And just as all action of the covenant is initiated by God, all promises in the future are God’s alone. There is no action required by people, there is only a promise that God’s way of dealing with creation will never include destruction again.

 

Suddenly, the story of Noah’s Ark seems even more powerful than it was before. It wasn't just that God looked around after the flood and thought, "Gee, the place could really use some more color." It was that God looked around after the flood and felt an emotion so powerful that it led God to put down God's weapon of war forever – or rather, to hang it in the sky as a sign and a promise that God would never again destroy the earth by flood.

 

So, while the bible never actually uses the word “rainbow”, it has become a visual reminder of God’s willingness to put down a weapon of destruction, a visual reminder of God’s faithfulness to all people, a visual reminder of the beginning of a new relationship between God and humanity. The rainbow is potent because it follows a great tragedy and marks God’s change of heart.

 

I guess you could say it’s a pretty famous rainbow because plenty of people have an idea of Noah’s story and God’s placing of that rainbow in the sky. The second most famous rainbow, in my opinion, is the rainbow flag.

 

In recent years, some more conservative Christians have tried to declare that the queer community has “stolen” the rainbow from God, citing Genesis 9 and calling on their followers to reappropriate it as a Christian anti-Queer symbol. And while the rainbow obviously has deep roots in Jewish and Christian scripture and tradition, as we just talked about, the scriptural references to a rainbow indicate God’s inclusion, redemption, love, and joy, not exclusion or condemnation.

 

It's also important to note here that the queer community is not the only group to fly a rainbow flag. In the anti-nuclear movement, rainbow flags waved for a world free of nuclear weapons in the wake of the nuclear age. Rainbow flags flew for peace when Europe became involved with the invasion of Iraq in 2002. They also waved over movements for Indigenous rights and freedom in Peru. The rainbow has become a symbol of diversity and liberation.

 

However, the 2SLGBTQ+ flag has become the most recognizable rainbow flag and no, we didn’t steal it from anyone. Its celebratory colors bore witness to events from the assassination of Harvey Milk to the AIDS pandemic to hate crimes. It was flown for the legalization of same-gender marriage, and it’s raised every year at Winnipeg City Hall to mark the beginning of Pride Week. Like the biblical rainbow, the pride flag’s rainbow is a vivid witness to the suffering and survival of its people. Today, the flag’s colors are multiplying, representing more pieces of the 2SLGBTQ+ community, making the flag that represents inclusion even more inclusive.

 

When you see a rainbow, whether flying high in solidarity or through the water following a rainstorm, it’s hard to feel anything but joy. The rainbow is a powerful symbol of joy across time periods and cultures, and wherever it is used, it marks faithful persistence through suffering and injustice. Like joy, the rainbow gains richer meaning from what it endures.

 

God’s rainbow covenant does not guarantee that humanity will never suffer again but it does promise to accompany and persist. Likewise, joy persists in order to assure humanity that God will never give up on us. The joy that is represented in God’s rainbow gives humanity’s most vulnerable people the courage to heal, gather strength, and thrive into the future.

 

Therefore, while we are singing the Hymn of the Day, I want to share with you the joy of rainbows by giving you all a rainbow sticker to take home with you. Keep it as reminder of God’s promise to always be with you, to stand by you in times of distress, and to give you hope for the possibility of a brighter future.

 

Amen.

 

(If you've read this blog and would like a sticker mailed to you, please mail a pre-stamped envelope to Reverend Theo Robinson c/o Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd 106 Sawchuk Drive St. Andrews, Manitoba R1A 4B4)



Resources:
pulpitfiction.com
Barn Geese Worship

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

To Love You Shall Return: A Sermon for Ash Wednesday

Photo: Melissa Hartog Illustration / Shutterstock

Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable to you, O Lord.

 

What an odd mashing up of days this year – Ash Wednesday on Valentine’s Day. It’s like the Christian and secular calendars have conspired to play a cruel practical joke on us with the irony of wanting to enjoy a box of chocolates on the first day of Lent, a time of fasting and self-denial.

 

Valentine’s Day wasn’t always about the chocolate though. There are a number of versions of the history of Valentine’s Day but the most noted legend is of a Roman priest who secretly performed marriages for soldiers against the wishes of Emperor Claudias II, who prohibited his soldiers from marrying. He felt that soldiers served better without being tied down to a wife and children.

 

Because of his willingness to join couples in holy matrimony, Valentine became known as the “friend of lovers”. When he was discovered, Valentine was imprisoned and executed on February 14. In 496 AD, Pope Gelasius I declared February 14 to be a day of celebration in honor of St. Valentine. Modern day commercialization has turned the day into what it is now.

 

Ash Wednesday marks the beginning of our Lenten season. Lent is a time for Christians to examine our lives, repent our sins, and be renewed in forgiveness for our sins through the crucified and risen Christ. It is a day when we reveal our invisible cross.

 

When you were baptized, a priest would have marked your forehead with a cross in oil. This marking sealed you by the Holy Spirit in Baptism and marked you as Christ’s own forever. Ash Wednesday is a special day of the year because we use the ashes from the previous year’s palms to make that cross appear on our foreheads once again.

 

By making visible again the cross that we received at Baptism, we acknowledge our impiety, our lack of repentance, our apathy to the suffering in the world. The imposition of ashes on our forehead is an outward symbol of our repentance and the renewed visibility of our baptismal cross reminds us of our baptismal promises.

 

By marking ourselves with the sign of the cross to signify the beginning of Lent, we also honour Jesus’ 40-day trek through the wilderness.

 

How strange it is to combine a day of commercialization and overabundance of food, drink, and of course, chocolate with a day where we begin a fast of such luxuries.

 

How strange it is to combine a day of love with a day where we are acknowledging the departure of Jesus into the wilderness and the time leading up to his gruesome death.

 

So, can Valentine’s Day and Ash Wednesday coexist? Can the frivolity of Valentine’s Day offer anything to the penitence of Ash Wednesday?

 

There is one obvious common denominator between the two days…love.

 

On Valentine’s Day, we celebrate the love we share with one another, whether it be with spouse, family, or friends. And tonight, we celebrate our love for God.

 

In the reading from the book of Joel, God asks for us to "return to God with all our heart" and to "rend our hearts".

 

God wants to have ALL of us, every piece of us, loving God... as the Almighty gave it ALL to show love for us. We do that partly by showing God our dedication, commitment, and love in showing up for Lent – giving up earthly things to focus on the sacred. Setting aside the chocolate and reveling in the love of God.

 

And while it seems that Valentine’s Day is very much a secular custom rather than a celebration of the life of St Valentine the martyr, there remains a very Christian message that should be remembered.

 

Ash Wednesday points us towards the greatest act of love when Jesus gave up His life on the cross so that we might be forgiven of our sins. The love of our Lord Jesus Christ is a sacrificial, selfless, and unconditional love. Jesus died for us knowing we might never love him back. Such is the love that each Christian is called to express in their own lives, for God, and for neighbour.

 

Tonight’s readings from Joel and from the Psalm speak of the Lord’s steadfast and everlasting love. In Corinthians, Paul declares us to be ambassadors for Christ. And never forget what Jesus said in John chapter 15, “This is my commandment: love one another as I have loved you. There is no greater love than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends.”

 

St Valentine fulfilled this command, and we need to do the same. In a world where hate, distrust, and violence seem to be on every news channel and every social media feed, we need to remember Jesus’ commandment and sacrifice of love even more than ever.

 

Today, in honor of the love of Valentine’s Day and the holiness of Ash Wednesday, let us take Jesus’ message into our hearts and pledge our love to our family, our friends, and to the stranger, praying for their intentions, promising fidelity to them, and never expecting anything in return.

 

Jesus broke death through love. God sent Jesus to break that death for us because of God’s love for the world. In our death, we remember that we are loved. We say, “remember you are dust and to dust you shall return.” But we could just as easily say, “remember you are loved and to love you shall return.”

 

A friend provided me with this affirmation that I think applies to us all tonight: Deep in the center of me flows an infinite wellspring of love that fills my entire being and radiates out from me in all directions, returning to me multiplied. I give and receive more love every day and the supply is endless.

 

May you feel an abundance of love tonight and forever.

 

Amen.

Saturday, February 10, 2024

A Review of the Book "Firestarter" by Stephen King


Title: Firestarter
Author: Stephen King
Publisher: The Viking Press
Year: 1980
428 pages

From the Back: The Department of Scientific Intelligence (aka "The Shop") never anticipated that two participants in their research program would marry and have a child. Charlie McGee inherited pyrokinetic powers from her parents, who had been given a low-grade hallucinogen called "Lot Six" while at college. Now the government is trying to capture young Charlie and harness her powerful fire-starting skills as a weapon as the couple desperately tries to hide their daughter from them. Her father taught her how to defuse her power, but as Charlie turns 11, the fire becomes harder and harder to control. When a mysterious operative finally finds the family, he tries to seize Charlie once and for all - but she has other plans.

Personal Thoughts: In my opinion, this story leans more into the science-fiction genre than horror or thriller. Which I didn't mind because I also love reading science-fiction books. There were multiple layers of storylines throughout Firestarter. The main point of the story was that the government wanted to capture a young girl, Charlie, who has very destructive powers, powers that she is slowly losing control over. The question is, how did she get these powers to begin with? The government trying to capture and possibly eliminate her was the primary cause of her powers.

When Charlie's dad was in college, he was short on money and decided to take part in a government experiment. The issue is that the people involved weren't told the truth about the effects of the drugs they were given. One of my favorite parts of this book was how King wrote about the side effects of the mini-super power Charlie's dad has. King's writing makes you believe you could actually feel his symptoms.

As the book progressed, more and more of Charlie's history was revealed and you can't help but root for her and her dad in their fight against the government. There were spurts where I just couldn't put the book down. Firestarter is full of action, government conspiracy, excitement, and familial love and King's writing pulls you deep into the story. His ability to write across genres is incredible.

Monday, February 5, 2024

Transgender Liturgies: Why Are They Important?


A version of this piece was published in the Broadview online magazine in July. You can read it HERE.

Transphobia has been rearing it's ugly head all across North America. People are attacked while trying to use the bathroom. Kids are afraid to go to school for fear of bullying. Politicians are making laws that are forcing teachers to out students to their parents. And in all of these instances of blatant transphobia, the bible is used as a weapon. Sermons are preached from the pulpit defending these transphobic actions. So-called Christians rejected transgender people with claims of "it's a fad", "protect the children", and "God doesn't make mistakes". So it makes sense that churches aren't seen as places someone can go for a safe haven and it makes sense that an increasing number of transgender people are walking away from church communities and losing faith in God.

No matter that some people are claiming that transgender people are a new thing, transgender and non-binary Christians are now and have always been in the church, including the Anglican Church. What's new is that we are no longer hiding who we are and we are looking to be seen, loved, and cared for within the church. The Anglican Church of Canada has spent the last 20 years working on social statements of the church, standing against homophobia and transphobia, and calling for protection of the vulnerable. Unfortunately, there has been more talk than action which makes the transgender community wonder if the church is really listening.

So when, in the fall of 2020, I was contacted by the Reverend Dr Eileen Scully to join a working group around transgender liturgies, I immediately agreed to be a participant. Over the last few years, I have had the amazing opportunity to work with transgender and gender non-binary persons, along with a few chosen allies, to be the consultative group to discuss the theological, pastoral, and liturgical lenses as a way to shape new Anglican liturgical rites and the careful pastoral introduction to them. As we lived across the country, we met over Zoom and had amazing discussions about what parts of liturgy we loved and what we thought was missing. Although there were sporadic conversations about God being gendered as male through the Book of Alternative Services, most of the discussion centered on specific rites and prayers that we, as transgender people, are in search of when we are worshipping, and to acknowledge different points of our transition. Through the time that these liturgies were discussed, written, and re-written, it was so amazing to work with a group of people who were just like me. It can feel a little lonely not knowing if there are any other transgender people in leadership, or even in the church. Not everyone is comfortable advertising their gender identity, so you just don’t know who is out there.

Changing and adding liturgies within the Anglican Church of Canada. It involves submitting them to the highest governing body of the church for approval. Every three years, the General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada, meets to discuss matters of national importance, review and approve financial reports, and consider legislation that affects the national church. On occasion, matters of worship and liturgy are brought to General Synod for review and approval, as was the case at last year’s meeting which convened June 27-July 2 in Calgary, AB. Resolution A122, Pastoral Liturgies for Journeys for Gender Transition and Affirmation, was brought to the floor of General Synod by Finn Keesmaat-Walsh (Ontario) and Reverend Marnie Peterson (British Columbia).

Finn Keesmaat-Walsh was one of those people I met and as I was not able to attend the General Synod personally, I asked them what it was like being on the floor for this resolution. Finn told me that with the 2019 General Synod in mind where the Synod was considering the motion of change the marriage canon, they were bracing for the worst, convinced that someone would request a vote by orders. (The vote in 2019 was ultimately lost in the order of bishops.) No request was made; therefore, a simple vote was taken with a majority overwhelmingly achieved. It was such a different result than the 2019 General Synod that I think we are still in a bit of shock.

Ultimately, the end result was good news! The Anglican Church of Canada became the first in the worldwide communion to have Pastoral Liturgies for Journeys for Gender Transition and Affirmation. As Primate Linda Nichols stated following the vote, “by approving these liturgies, we are sending a message that the Anglican Church of Canada stands in solidarity with transgender people.” These liturgies represent a public affirmation by the Anglican Church that we as transgender and non-binary folx are accepted, welcomed, and loved as the people that we are, and that we are all beloved children of God. According to Dr Scully, the person who spearheaded the consultation group, "This is historic for our part of the Christian church, in the worldwide Anglican Communion, and is an important moment in the life of the world and a great example of a grassroots movement in the church met with the discernment – in parliamentary process – of the church in a really good way. It’s the church waking up and recognizing a need for change in ourselves, a change that’s coming as we welcome the gifts of those we’ve not recognized well or at all in our midst."

Again, the acceptance of these liturgies represents a public affirmation by the Anglican Church that we as transgender and non-binary folx are accepted, welcomed, and loved as the people that we are, and that we are all beloved children of God. We have moved beyond talking into action by listening to the people who are actually affected by the work, or lack of work, of the task forces that have been set up over the last two decades. Rather than a group of straight cisgender people making decisions, the church is actually listening the transgender community. Having these liturgies affirmed by the national church is the beginning of creating space for healing the church’s relationship with those who left their home church, whether by choice or by force, because they are transgender or non-binary. It is one of many steps towards true and full inclusion of 2SLGBTQIA+ people in the Anglican Church of Canada. This public affirmation could, ultimately, save lives.

Previously, when I came out as transgender to my priest, I feared rejection from her and my parish. I was also scared to come out to my bishop as I thought he would revoke my request to become a priest. If I had seen liturgies such as these being offered, I would have trusted that support would be there for me. In the end, I was one of the lucky ones because support for me never wavered. My priest was pleased to do a renaming ceremony for me. We created it ourselves because these now-authorized liturgies didn’t exist at the time.

Someone asked me if I would now go back and use some of these new liturgies on myself, like the Affirmation of Gender Identity, for example. Honestly, I hadn’t thought of it. But even if I don’t use these liturgies for myself, I am sure glad that they exist now. It shows that the Anglican Church of Canada is making space for me and others like me! And that’s the best feeling in the world right now.

Friday, February 2, 2024

To Work, To Serve, To Minister: A Sermon for the Fifth Sunday After Epiphany


Grace, mercy, and peace to you in the name of Christ our Saviour. Amen.

 

One of the things that has always irked me about the Bible is the lack of details. When you read a good novel, there are chapters that introduce you to characters and their backstories. These chapters are used to get you involved with the people and then you want to read on to find out what happens to them. But in the bible, those details are lacking. One of the most poignant examples is what was Jesus up to for 30 years? I won’t get into that right now, but you get my drift.

 

Today’s Gospel reading is no different. Jesus is at Simon and Andrew’s house where Simon’s mother-in-law is sick with a fever. I have questions. Why do Simon and Andrew live together? If Simon has a mother-in-law, it implies that he is married. So to whom is he married? Saying that she has a fever is pretty general. Is it just a fever that most of us would just sleep it off? Or is it a more life-threatening illness? Where are the details??

 

Especially when it comes to women, the Bible more than not leaves them nameless even though they are some of the most important pieces of the development of our relationship with Jesus.

 

Simon’s mother-in-law is left nameless, Simon’s spouse seems to have been left out of the story, and we have no idea how threatening the illness is, but what we do know is that Simon was worried enough that after witnessing Jesus dispel the unclean spirit from the man earlier in the day, he asked Jesus to come and heal his mother-in-law.

 

The healing of Simon’s mother-in-law is a classic healing story. It’s all fine and good. It’s what Jesus does. It’s what he’s good at. But there is something disturbing about this story that doesn’t seem to have anything to do with healing.

 

According to the NRSV translation, verse 31 goes as such: “He came and took her by the hand and lifted her up. Then the fever left her, and she began to serve them.” Did anyone else bristle at these words?

 

Assuming that this fever was life-threatening, this woman was just brought back to life with Jesus’ healing. What would you do if you were brought back from the edge of death? Would your first instinct be to get up and serve people?

 

I decided to look up some other translations.

 

NIV – “So he went to her, took her hand and helped her up. The fever left her and she began to wait on them.”

 

KJV – “And he came and took her by the hand, and lifted her up; and immediately the fever left her, and she ministered unto them.”

 

Message – “He went to her, took her hand, and raised her up. No sooner had the fever left than she was up fixing dinner for them.”

 

Yikes. That last one especially gets my goat.

 

Of course Jesus healed her – they needed someone to make them some dinner! As if Jesus is saying, "What do you mean she’s sick? We can’t have this. I’ll have her up and cooking in no time.” As my friend Rachel Twigg put it in her 2018 sermon, “Jesus heals her and immediately she gets up and begins to serve him. What did she serve him? A sandwich?”

 

I say again, yikes.

 

I don’t tend to read the King James Version, but I think that translation hits a little closer to home than the rest. Here’s why I say that.

 

Mark 1:31 uses the word serve which translates to diakoneo in the Greek language. This same word was used in Mark 10:45 “for the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve” and in Mark 1:13 when “angels waited on him.”

 

Translating the same Greek word as “minister” when angels are the subject but “serve” when a woman is the subject downplays her action. As translated, Jesus’ healing of Simon’s mother-in-law and the miracle’s outcome are extremely gendered in ways that veer too close to the stereotypes we know to be tired and destructive.

 

Instead, let’s look at the fact that diakoneo is the root of the word Deacon. Perhaps Simon’s mother-in-law is the first to understand what it is to follow Jesus thus becoming the first deacon. Unlike many stories of healing in the Bible, she doesn’t get healed because of her great faith; there is no mention that she believed at all. But once she is healed, the woman gets right out of bed and begins to work, to serve, to minister.

 

Though the details about her are left out of the story, details like her name and the reason for her illness, this woman who appears not to have been a believer, is now a follower of Christ. She has been transformed by her encounter with Christ and will now live out her life in service of others.

 

Just as the demons do in the previous scene, the fever “leaves her.” Having been “raised,” she “serves” them. While literally it could mean she served them food and drink, the word’s presence here shows that her service is to be interpreted as a model response of faith. Meaning both to serve at a table and to do ministry.

 

I agree with Rachel Twigg when she says, “Simon’s unnamed mother-in-law is really a model of Christian discipleship, the embodiment of the type of discipleship that Jesus will embody in his own life and ministry, and which he will call his disciples to emulate. A type of service that his male disciples will often fail to live up to.”

 

So while the words “she began to serve them” makes us cringe because of how we know society treats women, then and now, the healed woman’s reaction to her encounter with Christ is actually something for us to strive towards.

 

Jesus heals this woman – she is brought to wholeness, to completeness – and she takes her rightful role in service to others. We could learn so much from her.

 

Serving is not “woman’s work”, nor is it lesser than being served. Simon’s mother-in-law is more than a cook, waiter, and dishwasher. She’s also a follower. If she’s a follower, and a follower who is willing to serve as she goes, then she’s also a disciple. If she’s a disciple, then to her “has been given the secret of the kingdom of God” (Mark 4:11). Service is not the “proper place of women” it is the proper place for all Christians.

 

This woman shows us that when we allow Jesus to come near and touch us, we are raised to the highest calling – to serve others. And her service was not a one-time, over-and-done-with action, like cooking a meal. Simon’s mother-in-law began to serve Jesus and his followers. But the meaning of her actions was transformed by Jesus’ healing touch. She did not serve and minister to them because of some duty. She served out of love. Simon’s mother-in-law became as much a follower of Jesus as any of his disciples. Mark describes her using language that makes her the first deacon in Christianity. She was the first person to have their ordinary diakonos, or service of others, transformed into servant ministry.

 

Simon Peter’s mother-in-law provides us an example by which to live – to respond to the love of God, the healing and forgiving touch of Jesus, by sharing that love with those around us. And, as you share God’s love, you are living into your own vocation as a minister of the Gospel as a teacher, lawyer, salesperson, doctor, volunteer, parent, grandparent, spouse, friend to the glory of God. Your ordinary work will be ministry simply by the virtue of your baptism.

 

Amen.




Resources:
"New Collegeville Bible Commentary: New Testament" edited by Daniel Durken
"The Women's Bible Commentary" edited by Carol A Newsom and Sharon H Ringe
"Feasting on the Word" edited by David L Bartlett and Barbara Brown Taylor
pulpitfiction.com
workingpreacher.com
theologicalstew.com