Tuesday, October 22, 2024

A Review of the Book "The Good, The Bad, and the Smug" by Tom Holt


Title: The Good, The Bad, and the Smug
Author: Tom Holt
Publisher: Hachette Book Group
Year: 2015
344 pages

From the Back: Mordak isn't bad, as far as goblins go, but when someone, or something, starts pumping gold into the human kingdom, it puts his rule into serious jeopardy. Suddenly he's locked in an arms race with a species whose arms he once considered merely part of a calorie-controlled diet. Helped by an elf with a background in journalism and a master's degree in being really pleased with herself, Mordak sets out to discover what on earth (if, indeed, that's where he is) is going on. He knows that the truth is out there. If only he could remember where he put it.

Personal Thoughts: This was a hilarious book. Full stop. I almost never show any emotion while I'm reading, but this book made me laugh out loud at almost every turn. Making the typically evil characters of a book the good guys; combining fantasy and fairy tales together; layering in all sorts of comedic events - this book was just so much fun to read! If this is his typical style of writing, I just might have to search out more of Tim Holt's books.

A Review of the Book "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat" by Oliver Sacks


Title: The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat
Author: Oliver Sacks
Publisher: Harper & Row Publishers Inc
Year: 1987
233 pages

From the Back: This is a collection of stories of individuals afflicted with fantastic perceptual and intellectual aberrations: patients who have last their memory and with it the greater part of their past; who are no longer able to recognize people and common objects; who are stricken with violent tics and grimaces or who short involuntary obscenities; whose limbs have become alien; who have been dismissed as mentally retarded yet are gifted with uncanny artistic or mathematical talents. If inconceivably strange, these brilliant tales remain deeply human. They are studies of life struggling against incredible adversity, and they enable us to enter the world of the neurologically impaired, to imagine with our hearts what it must be to live and feel as they do.

Personal Thoughts: A friend of mine found this book in a free library and, because of my work in pastoral care, thought it might be interesting to me. The title of the book helped a lot to grab our interest.
    This book was definitely written more for those who work in the neurological and psychological field. The language was quite scientific in places, going a little too deep into academia for me, simply because I am neither a neurologist or a psychologist. However the stories were quite well told and were, to say the least, intriguing. It certainly provided some insight to a variety of mental illnesses that exist in the world and a reminder that behind that illness is a human being simply trying to live their life.
    So while the information in this book was well beyond my professional need, it never hurts to be reminded of the humanity of each person that we may meet in our lives.

A Review of the Book "Ordinary Monsters" by J. M. Miro


Title: Ordinary Monsters
Author: J. M. Miro
Publisher: Penguin Random House
Year: 2022
658 pages

From the Back: England, 1882. In Victorian London, two children with mysterious powers are hunted by a figure of darkness - a man made of smoke.
    Sixteen-year-old Charlie Ovid, despite a brutal childhood in Mississippi, doesn't have a scar on him. His body heals itself, whether he wants it to or not. Marlowe, a foundling from a railway freight car, shines with a strange bluish light. He can melt or mend flesh. When a jaded female detective is recruited to escort them to safety, all three begin a journey into the nature of difference and belonging, and the shadowy edged of the monstrous.
    What follows is a story of wonder and betrayal, from the gaslit streets of London and the wooden theatres of Meiji-era Tokyo to an eerie estate outside Edinburgh, where other children with gifts - the talents - have been gathered. There, the world of the dead and the word of the living threaten to collide. And as secrets within the institute unfurl, Marlowe, Charlie, and the rest of the talents will discover the truth about their abilities and the nature of what is stalking them: that the worst monsters sometimes come bearing the sweetest gifts.
    Riveting in its scope and exquisitely written, Ordinary Monsters presents a catastrophic vision of the Victorian world - and of the gifted, broken children who must save it.

Personal Thoughts: I knew nothing about this book and bought it strictly because of the cover, the title, and the quantity of sales of the book I saw in the store at which I worked at the time. I am so glad I decided to pick this one up! Ordinary Monsters was quite the page turner, with a story and characters that pulled you right in. It was fast-paced and entertaining, reminding me of a mix of the historical times of Charles Dickens and the fantastical world of Gaiman.
    It was a fun read but just as a heads up, it does end on a cliffhanger as which time I googled frantically to ensure the second book existed. Turns out this is the first of what's called the "Talents Trilogy", with book #2 - Bringer of Dust - just published in September 2024 and the third still yet to come.

Friday, October 18, 2024

Another Big Question: A Sermon for the 22nd Sunday After Pentecost


Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable to you, O Lord, my rock and my redeemer.

 

Beginning in Mark 8:22 and continuing to the end of chapter 10, we find Jesus making his way to Jerusalem, predicting his impending death and resurrection, or maybe, more accurately, announcing his mission statement, three times. Let’s call it the Messiah’s Servant Mission.

 

The narrative of the Messiah’s Servant Mission is bracketed by the healing of two blind men: one in Bethsaida, and the other, Bartimeus, outside the gates of Jericho. Both seem to represent those, like many of the demons in Mark, who recognize who Jesus is immediately, unlike the disciples, who almost never do.

 

First, way back in chapter 8, Jesus cures a blind man at Bethsaida, but it doesn’t seem to take at first; indeed, it takes a little time for the man to regain his full sight. Then comes Peter’s declaration and Jesus’ first announcement of his impending death. But Peter doesn’t get it and rebukes Jesus (who in turn rebukes him right back.)

 

Then, in chapter 9, Jesus repeats his declaration that he will die in Jerusalem, a pronouncement that terrifies his disciples into silence. Until, that is, they begin arguing with each other about who is the greatest because, again, they don’t get it. Jesus’ words take time to sink in, so he puts before them a child and tells them that leadership and greatness are about welcoming the vulnerable.

 

Now, in chapter 10, Jesus says once more that he is going to Jerusalem to die. The lectionary has decided we don’t need to hear these verses, 32-34, possibly because it’s already been said twice. But I think these verses are important for today’s lesson, so I’ll read them now:

 

“They were on the road, going up to Jerusalem, and Jesus was walking ahead of them; they were amazed, and those who followed were afraid. He took the twelve aside again and began to tell them what was to happen to him, saying, ‘Look, we are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be handed over to the chief priests and the scribes, and they will condemn him to death; then they will hand him over to the gentiles; they will mock him and spit upon him and flog him and kill him, and after three days he will rise again.’”

 

And, as with the other two times, the disciples don’t get it. First, James and John ask for special places of honor and then the rest of the disciples resent their self-interested pushiness. Jesus’ words still haven’t sunk in and taken hold yet, so he says as plainly and clearly as possible that to be great is to serve others and that to be first is to be last. And then, if you read further into Mark, comes another healing of a blind man, Bartimaeus.

Ok let’s do a quick round up of what we have in these central chapters of Mark:

1.      Jesus Heals a Blind Man in Bethsaida

2.      First Declaration of the Messiah’s Servant Mission

3.      Peter puts his foot in his mouth

4.      Second Declaration of the Messiah’s Servant Mission

5.      The Disciples put their feet in their mouths

6.      Third Declaration of the Messiah’s Servant Mission

7.      James and John put their feet in their mouths

8.      Jesus Heals the Blind Man, Bartimeus, outside of Jericho

 

In three short chapters in Mark, Jesus tells these guys 3 times about his mission to serve, his destiny to suffer, and his pending resurrection. And all they can say is “what’s in it for me?”

 

What an incredible and heart-breaking quid pro quo statement. It’s the question of a consumer rather than a servant. Way too often, we do things only to get something in return. We look for the perks in the work we do instead of placing priority on the actual work being done. We look for what we can get out of it rather than what we can put in.

 

Now, if we’ve decided to change “Jesus’ predictions” to “Jesus’ mission statement”, then we need to understand what that mission statement is – one of servitude. Jesus has been sent to be the ultimate servant, to be a ransom or liberator for many, to offer the service of giving up his life for the sake of others. Jesus’ mission is to shatter and rebuilding the hierarchies – the first will be last and the last will be first. Jesus’ mission is to redefine the expectations of the Messiah – to focus less on an earthly kingdom and more on a heavenly kingdom.

 

And despite what we might think, James and John do in fact get this, they get who Jesus is and what he’s up to. And now they’re trying to make it work for them. Instead of considering him to be everyone’s servant, they treat him like their own personal servant – “We want you to do for us whatever we ask of you.” Has anyone said to you, “If I ask you to do something, promise me you’ll do it?” James and John are wanting Jesus to promise them he’ll “grant their wish”, so to speak, without first hearing their request.

 

But Jesus doesn’t buy it. He can tell that these guys are trying to get something out of him and instead of giving in, Jesus turns the question around on them, “What is it you want me to do for you?” So, the two J’s lay it out for him – they want to be the first in glory with him. Ok maybe they don’t get it after all.

 

“What’s in it for me?” This is the basis of James and John’s request. Instead of striving to serve more, they are just trying to get ahead. And don’t go thinking the other 10 are any better. Once they see what J-squared are doing, they get all pissed off and probably jealous that they didn’t think of it first.

 

But let’s be honest, following Jesus isn’t anything glorious. Following Jesus leads to persecution and death. Following Jesus leads to the cross. Jesus doesn’t mince words with his response to James and John. He says, “You don’t know what you’re asking.” Be careful what you’re asking for…

 

Remember what the request was? “Appoint us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory.” Jesus is trying to tell James and John that don’t really want to be sitting on his left and his right. Because who is it at Jesus’ left and right side at the time of his death? A pair of criminals on crosses. How ironic…

 

Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross becomes the ultimate show of servant leadership and self-sacrificial love, and we are called to follow his example. We need to turn away from looking for the rewards and turn towards answering the higher call of Jesus to be a disciple by serving others. We need to turn the question “what’s in it for me?” into “Who will I serve?” For it is by following Jesus’ Mission Statement of Servanthood that we will find wholeness and grace. And that is indeed good news.

 

Amen.




Resources:
"New Collegeville Bible Commentary" edited by Daniel Durken
"Feasting on the Word" edited by David L Bartlett and Barbara Brown Tayler
pulpitfiction.com
workingpreacher.org
davidlose.net

Saturday, October 12, 2024

The Big Question: A Sermon for the 21st Sunday After Pentecost

Photo Credit: Ibrahim Rifath on unsplash.com

Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable to you, O Lord, my rock and my redeemer.

 

Who here would consider themselves to be rich?

 

I don’t tend to think of myself as rich, at least not a grandiose idea of rich, like compared to NHL players, or Elon Musk. I mostly live paycheck to paycheck, I worry about budgeting and finances, I don’t take luxurious trips, I don’t own a cabin on the lake. All of these things that might come to mind when you hear the word “rich”, people who don’t have to worry about money, who travel around the world, who own multiple properties and cars.

 

But, in the grand scheme of things, I am rich. I have a roof over my head, food on my table, a car to be able to drive to places. You see, wealth is relative. There can be many reasons why a person feels they need to earn every dollar and keep it to themselves or gather as much stuff around them as possible. But what we see in the news and on social media are the select few who seem to have all of the world’s wealth and the rest of us who maybe wished we had more riches. And the advertising industry has been built on making us think we need more in order to gain true happiness.

 

But money and possessions aren’t inherently sinful. It’s what a person does with that money or those possessions that matters. Have they become idols? Do they help in your faith life or your ministry? Can possessions be labeled as good or bad? Blessings or hindrances? Deficits or potential assets? As I said, it’s all relative so the answer is…it depends.

 

In today’s Gospel, a man with many possessions encountered Jesus. This man of means who presents himself to Jesus wears the robes of the upper echelon, a far cry from most of the other characters who we’ve seen interacting with Jesus. Most everyone in the bible, Jesus and the twelve included, are part of the peasantry. Jesus was the son of a carpenter, after all. No “middle class” exists in the New Testament. A select few enjoy the high life. Everyone else scrapes by at the subsistence level, working day and night and having very little to show for it.

 

And this man, robes and all, kneeling before Jesus, starts off with a question: “What must I do to inherit eternal life?” Did this man with many possessions see himself as a child of God who was due a birthright like one might expect from a parent? He wanted Jesus to tell him how to secure the benefits of God’s kingdom and to find the key to a meaningful, contented, and fulfilling life.

 

This man rattles off that he has been the perfect human being, following all of the commandments, 100% of the time. He figures that of all people, he must have earned his way into heaven, but he wants to make sure. So, he asks, “What must I do to inherit eternal life?” And what was Jesus’ answer? “You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me.”

 

Not the answer the man was expecting. (Does Jesus ever answer in the way we expect?) What Mark tells us is the man leaves, grieving, because he knew how much stuff he had. It’s a vague ending and leaves us to our imagination on what the man ended up doing. Perhaps he walked away because he knew he’d never be able to do as Jesus asked. Or perhaps he did sell his possessions and became as good an evangelist as the women who ran from the tomb to tell everyone they knew what had happened. We just don’t know.

 

So, is Jesus really asking us to sell all our possessions, give the money away, and live in poverty? Some would say yes and have vowed to live out vows of poverty, living with very little and having no real amounts of money to speak of.

 

But I would say that, for the most part, God is not expecting us to live with nothing, although many of us probably have more than we need. Jesus’ comment here does make a person think, though. What kind of power do our possessions have on us? Perhaps Jesus is asking us to reevaluate the idolatry we have made of money and “stuff”?

 

Returning to the man in the story, Jesus tells him he “lacks one thing.” But what does this fellow lack, exactly? By material standards, by society’s standards, by the measures of the world that have determined the criteria for abundance and blessing, he lacks nothing at all.

 

Does he lack an ability to care for the poor? Does he lack a consciousness of another’s scarcity? Does he lack the ability to appreciate his abundance?

 

It is so easy for us to view the concept of lack in only material things, material categories, as if lack is only determined by an absence of wealth. Wealth does something to us and that something is usually not viewed as having a positive effect. Riches seem to steer our glance inward, to stoke our individuality, to set our sights on our own abundance with no thought about securing someone else’s.

 

What is the “one thing missing” Jesus would see in you? Where do you locate your abundance? If we do find ourselves with an abundance of earthly treasures, what is it you think we should do with that abundance? What is the one thing that is at the core of who you are that keeps you from being the follower, the disciple, the believer, the witness God wants and needs you to be?

 

In this story, the man seems to be looking out for himself, asking what he can do for his own salvation. The man’s mind-set, often typical of those with privilege, is contradictory to Jesus’ teaching. Throughout scripture, Jesus has been pretty clear that we don’t have to do anything to earn the Kingdom of God. Our inheritance of eternal life is a gift of grace and mercy from God. However, what we do with our lives should bring us into right relationship with God and with God’s creation, our neighbour. The man asks, “What can I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus turns the question to a new behaviour that is required – give what you have for the sake of others.

 

Jesus tells us repeatedly that the Kingdom of God is here, and to join him, to follow him, will take changes in activity and behaviour that might be hard and painful. Jesus’ challenge to the man in the story today, a challenge to those who are wealthy, is a critical lesson for 21st century society, particularly those who live in privilege. Jesus loves this man he encounters and wants him to be free from the power of his possessions and wealth so that he can fully experience life in the Kingdom of God. Jesus wants the same for us.

 

Life in the kingdom is about caring for others and sharing from our abundance. Life in the kingdom is about experiencing transformation in ourselves and in those around us. Does it feel impossible? Maybe. Letting go of all that we are holding on to, all of the earthly treasures that are holding us captive, can be excruciatingly difficult and painful. It is hard to let go of what we depend upon, to let go of what we think we need to trust in God's grace and providence, to recognize that we have already gracefully and mercifully inherited eternal life. But as Jesus tells his disciples, and us, “For mortals it is impossible, but not for God; for in God all things are possible.”

 

Amen.





Resources:
"New Collegeville Bible Commentary" edited by Daniel Durken
"Feasting on the Word" edited by David L Bartlett and Barbara Brown Tayler
pulpitfiction.com
workingpreacher.org
episcopalchurch.org
preachingandpondering.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, October 8, 2024

A Review of the Book "A Year of Biblical Womanhood" by Rachel Held Evans


Title: A Year of Biblical Womanhood
Author: Rachel Held Evans
Publisher: Thomas Nelson Inc
Year: 2012
308 pages

From the Back: Strong-willed and independent, Rachel Held Evans couldn't sew a button on a blouse before she embarked on a radical life experiment - a year of biblical womanhood. Intrigued by the traditionalist resurgence that led many of her friends to abandon their careers to assume traditional gender roles in the home, Evans decides to try it for herself, vowing to take all of the Bible's instructions for women as literally as possible for a year.
    Evans learns the hard way that her quest for biblical womanhood requires more than a "gentle and quiet spirit" (1 Peter 3:4). It means growing out her hair, making her own clothes, covering her head, obeying her husband, rising before dawn, abstaining from gossip, remaining silent in church, and even camping out in the front yard during her period.
    With just the right mixture of humour and insight, compassion and incredulity, A Year of Biblical Womanhood is an exercise in scriptural exploration and spiritual contemplation. What does God truly expect of women, and is there really a prescription for biblical womanhood? Come along with Evans as she looks for answers in the rich heritage of biblical heroines, models of grace, and all-around women of valour.

Personal Thoughts: This was an absolutely incredible book that, I feel, successfully showed if we tried to live as biblical literalists, we would all struggle very much. But also, there is so much more to learn from the biblical women than the religious world has let on. Evans is an amazing writer who allows herself to be quite vulnerable in her storytelling while bringing humour along for the ride, as well. It is so easy to read her books and you can't help but become passionate about the words on the pages.
    If you want to learn more about the women of the bible, what is was like to live their everyday lives, and the power they still have on our lives today, then I truly recommend "A Year of Biblical Womanhood". You might be surprised at the things you learn!

Tuesday, October 1, 2024

A Review of the Book "A Grief Observed" by C. S. Lewis


Title: A Grief Observed
Author: C. S. Lewis
Publisher: HarperCollins Publishers
Year: 1961
76 pages

From the Back: Written after his wife's tragic death as a way of surviving the "mad midnight moments," A Grief Observed is C. S. Lewis' honest reflection on the fundamental issues of life, death, and faith in the midst of loss. This work contains his concise, genuine reflections on that period. This is a beautiful and unflinchingly honest record of how even a stalwart believer can lose all sense of meaning in the universe, and how he can gradually regain his bearings.

Personal Thoughts: Everyone eventually grieves something or someone, and each person experiences that grief in a different way. Grief is such a powerful thing and is one of those pieces of human behaviour that can be so difficult to understand. There's no predictability in it, no perfect set of rules to follow on how to process and recover from grief. The only reason we know anything about it at all is that some people have been strong enough to share their stories. CS Lewis is one of those people.
    In this short little book, Lewis shares some incredible reflections about the grief he experienced with the death of his wife. His amazing story-telling ability brings you right alongside of him as he describes his despair, sadness, longing, and loss of faith, and then his journey back to his life that will be without his beloved. An absolutely beautiful piece of writing that so obviously came directly from Lewis' heart.