Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Professional Sports and the National Anthem

Photo Credit: Lara Jameson on pexels.com

Over dinner one evening, my partner and I were watching a hockey game when the national anthems had just finished and I posed the question, "I wonder why the national anthem is sung at professional sporting events." Although we had guesses, we didn't know for sure so we looked it up.

Upon reading a New York Times article from December 2023, this is what I found:

"The first documented case of an anthem being played prior to a sporting event dates all the way back to May of 1862, when “The Star Spangled Banner” was played prior to a baseball game in Brooklyn, N.Y. The practice then occurred sporadically over the next several decades, with the national anthem being played prior to significant sporting events such as the World Series. Playing the anthem then gained traction during the Second World War. As North American professional sports leagues carried on playing during the conflict overseas, teams started playing the national anthem as a symbol of wartime support and patriotism."

Continuing on with that article, the playing of the national anthem before professional sporting events is a "uniquely North American phenomenon. In Europe, national anthems are reserved for major international competitions, or when an urgent or important national situation arises."

So if the national anthems being sung before professional sporting events began during WWI and WWII as a way to show patriotism, what purpose does it serve now? Is it time to do away with this tradition? Especially when you consider how many non-North Americans play in the MLB, the NFL, and the NHL?

I decided to post the question on Facebook and the answers I got in return were varied but certainly emotional. There is a heartfelt need to defend the importance of the national anthem but the reasoning of it being at the front of a sports game falls into the typical "because it's always been this way." This is a sentence that is the bane of anyone who is working towards change. The grip on to tradition without understanding where that tradition came from is not a reason to keep things the same. A term I learned about recently is "temporal disorientation" which means something along the lines of "we've always done it this way before" but then not knowing for sure if there was a "before" or the reasons why "the thing" is being done.

On the flip side, there is something to be said about ritual and the community that is found within ritual practices. There is a reason church services look similar, having the same parts, more or less in the same order. Ritual practices are important as it forms a way of connecting with God and with each other.

Now I'm not saying that singing the national anthem before a hockey game will bring you closer to God, but it can certainly bring you closer to the person beside you as you sing in unity the song that represents your country.

I'm still not sold that the anthems need to be played at professional sporting events and that it should be kept more for international levels where athletes are actually representing their countries. However, I do understand the need and desire for ritual and the importance behind it. When it comes to the national anthem being sung before a sports game, we've forgotten why it started and have lost the meaning behind it. The audience often boos the opposing anthem and some singers aren't even taking the time to learn the words or the music.

So if we, the general public "we", still find singing the national anthem to be an important ritual to professional sporting events, then let's at least care about what we are singing and why. Even if that means yelling "True North" for us Manitobans and voicing our opinion of the truth behind the freedom in this country. Because even those parts have become ritualistic but at least we know why we're doing it.


Friday, June 21, 2024

David and Goliath: The Assumption of Perception: A Sermon for the 5th Week After Pentecost


May only truth be spoken and only truth received. Amen.

 

In our reading from Samuel, we got to hear the familiar story of David and Goliath.

 

But before we get to the fun stuff like using slingshots, I want to give you a little bit of background to our story.

 

Ancient Palestine had along its eastern border a mountain range. In that mountain range are all of the ancient cities of that region – Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Hebron.

 

Then there's a coastal plain along the Mediterranean where Tel Aviv is now and connecting the mountain range with the coastal plain is a series of valleys and ridges that run east to West. You would have to go through this valley to get from the coastal plain to the mountains.

 

This part of Israel is full of forests and wheat fields and vineyards.

 

More importantly, though, in the history of that region, it had a real strategic function. It is how hostile armies on the coastal plain find their way up into the mountains and threaten those living in the mountains.

 

That’s where we are in today’s reading from Samuel.

 

The Philistines, who are the biggest of enemies of the Kingdom of Israel, are living in the coastal plain. They are originally a seafaring people, and they start to make their way through one of the valleys up into the mountains.

 

They want to occupy the highland area right by Bethlehem and split the Kingdom of Israel in two.

 

The king of Israel, King Saul, obviously catches wind of this and Saul brings his army down from the mountains and confronts the Philistines in the valley of Elah, one of the most beautiful of the valleys in the area.

 

The Israelites dig in along the northern ridge and the Philistines dig in along the southern ridge and the two armies just sit there for weeks and stare at each other.

 

They're deadlocked. Neither could attack the other because to attack the other side you've got to come down the mountain into the valley and then up the other side and you're completely exposed.

 

So, finally, to break the deadlock, the Philistines send their mightiest warrior down into the valley floor and he calls out and he says to the Israelites, “send your mightiest warrior down and we’ll have this out, just the two of us!”

 

This was a tradition in ancient warfare called single combat. It was a way of settling disputes without incurring the bloodshed of a major battle.

 

The Philistine sent down their mighty warrior. He is a giant. He's 9 feet tall. He's outfitted head to toe in this glittering bronze armor and he's got a sword and he's got a javelin and he's got a spear.

 

He is absolutely terrifying. He's so terrifying that none of the Israelite soldiers want to fight him.

 

It's a death wish, right? There's no way they think they can take him.

 

Finally, the only person who will come forward is this young shepherd boy, who goes up to Saul and he says, “I’ll fight” and Saul says, “you can't fight! That's ridiculous! You’re just a kid, he is a mighty warrior!”

 

But the shepherd is adamant. He says, “no, no, no, you don't understand! I have been defending my flock against lions and wolves for years. I can do this!”

 

Saul has no choice. No one else has come forward. Saul says, “alright then.” He turns to the kid and says, “but you've got to wear this armor. You can't go as you are.”

 

He tries to give the shepherd his armor and the shepherd says no, “I've never worn armor before! You’ve got to be crazy!”

 

The shepherd boy reaches down, instead, and picks up five stones and puts them in his shepherd’s bag and starts to walk down the mountainside to meet the giant.

 

The giant sees this figure approaching and calls out, “come to me so I could feed your flesh to the to birds of the heavens and to the beasts of the field!” He is taunting this person coming to fight him.

 

The shepherd draws closer and closer and the giant sees that he's carrying a staff.

 

That's all he's carrying, instead of a weapon, just this shepherd staff.

 

And the giant, insulted, says, “am I a dog that you would come to me with sticks?”

 

The shepherd boy takes one of the stones out of his bag, puts it in his sling, and rolls it around and let's it fly, and it hits the giant right between the eyes! Right in his most vulnerable spot, and he falls down, unconscious.

 

The shepherd boy runs up, takes the giant’s sword, and cuts off the giant’s head. The Philistines see this, and they turn and run.

 

The ever-popular story of David and Goliath, where David has always been considered the underdog, with the assumption that Goliath should have won that fight.

 

Why is this the assumption?

 

Is it because Goliath is so tall and David is so small?

 

Is it because Goliath has all the weapons and David has nothing but a sling and a rock?

 

In general, we tend to judge people by their appearance, even if we don’t mean to.

 

Think for a moment about your reaction to the following images:

 

A big guy, wearing a leather jacket covered in tattoos and piercings?

 

A woman dressed in a business suit?

 

A group of teenagers hanging out on the corner?

 

A person sitting outside 7-11 asking for change?

 

An elderly-looking couple sitting on their porch?

 

A well-kept lawn?

 

A backyard full of car parts and other random items?

 

Take note of your internal reactions to those images.

 

Perception is everything, and yet, it means nothing.

 

We don’t know anything about those people or those homes. We see them and we make an assumption based on our perception.

 

When David walks out to meet Goliath in the valley, we can imagine the Philistines laughing at David’s size and the Israelites embarrassed that their smallest person was the only one with courage enough to face the giant.

 

But they knew nothing about David, the shepherd of sheep who protects his flock from lions and other prey on a daily basis.

 

David, the man who is a sharp-shooter with a sling – a sling, not a sling-shot – 2 very different weapons – who was trained to take down a rushing lion in a single shot.

 

Our perception of people, our assumptions about them, need to go beyond exterior looks.

 

We need to look deeper into a person’s life history in order to get to know them, and even then, it is not our place to judge, but to have empathy and grace.

 

We also need to consider other people’s perception of us.

 

June is Pride month, but it also National Indigenous History Month. And June 21 was National Indigenous Peoples Day where we were to recognize and celebrate the history, heritage, resilience and diversity of First Nations, Inuit and Métis across Canada.

 

We have created a perception that we walk with the Indigenous community, thousands of souls who were stolen, survived, lost, and now found.

 

But it’s easy to grieve for these babies and children, taken from their families never to return, or never to be the same again.

 

It’s easy to reflect an air of grief and sorrow for the families.

 

It’s all about perception.

 

Now we need to care and grieve for those who survived.

 

We need to action on behalf of the alcoholic, the drug addict, the beggars, and the parents who never got to parent.

 

We need to walk with those who physically survived Residential Schools but have lost their futures.

 

We need to recognize that we have an opportunity to correct our perception of the Indigenous community by learning the factual history of Canada, extend apologies, and make change for the future of our relationship with them.

 

It is easy to be Goliath, a giant who expects everyone to tremble before us. A giant who will stomp on anyone in our way.

 

We need to be David. Going into the fight with nothing but a few stones and a strong faith in God as our weapons.

 

When David’s stone hit Goliath in the forehead, history was forever changed.

 

Now it’s time for us to pick up our stones, hold tight to our faith, and take down our own Goliaths.

 

Amen.

Tuesday, June 4, 2024

A Review of the First 3 Books from the Haunted Canada Series by Pat Hancock


Title: Haunted Canada 1, 2, 3
Author: Pat Hancock
Publisher: Scholastic Canada Ltd
Year: 2003, 2005, 2007
337 pages

From the Back: Three collections of chilling true ghost stories, from all across Canada, to send shivers down your spine. From poltergeists who terrorize hunters to a headless women who wanders the streets to serpents rising from the waves, these true tales of terror will chill you to the bone. Prepare yourself to be haunted!

Personal Thoughts: I don't know where I picked up these books but as I'm in a swing of reading horror novels, I figured why not read some true spooky stories from right here in Canada! Being that there are written for children, I knew that they wouldn't measure up to Stephen King, but they were still fun and haunting short stories that gives you the chills thinking that they were happening in our own country. Of course, I was especially fond of the Winnipeg stories - the haunting of the Burton Cummings Theatre and the ghost in Hotel Fort Garry.
    These are fun books that could be brought along camping for reading by the fire before bed. I discovered that there are plenty in the series so maybe I'll pick them up and read more about the spooky things happening in Canada.

A Review of the Book "The Skin We're In" by Desmond Cole


Title: The Skin We're In
Author: Desmond Cole
Publisher: Doubleday Canada
Year: 2020
220 pages

From the Back: Puncturing the bubble of Canadian smugness and naïve assumptions of a post-racial nation, Desmond Cole chronicles just one year - 2017 - in the struggle against racism in this country. It was a year that saw calls for tighter borders when Black refugees braved frigid temperatures to cross into Manitoba from the States, Indigenous land and water protectors resisting the celebration of Canada's 150th birthday, police across the country rallying around an officer accused of murder, and more.
    Month-by-month, Cole creates a comprehensive picture of entrenched, systemic inequality. Urgent, controversial, and unsparingly honest, The Skin We're In is destined to become a vital text for anti-racist and social justice movements in Canada, as well as a potent antidote to the all-too-present complacency of many white Canadians.

Personal Thoughts: The Skin We're In is an amazingly powerful book. Cole provides excellent insight into the many events that happened throughout 2017, events that have significantly shifted the public viewpoint of racism in North America, events that although the public was aware occurred, likely aren't aware of just how much hate and disregard for human life lies behind what happened. If you had any doubt about the racism that exists in our world, that doubt will be obliterated after reading this book. Personally, I think The Skin We're In should become part of our school curriculum so that maybe, just maybe, the youth of today will be able to alter the trajectory of our future because it is only through the education and awareness of systemic racism that change will begin.